Meg Friedman

Return to the Stage: A Performance Arts Workforce Study

RETURn TO THE STAGE.jpg

RETURN TO THE STAGE study launches TODAY!

Please participate! As arts organizations have grappled with sudden shutdowns, what have been the COVID-19 impacts on the Performing Arts workforce? RETURN TO THE STAGE, an independent longitudinal study of the Performing Arts workforce, will document the impacts on this unique population, as well as reveal if coronavirus-related shutdowns have disproportionately affected specific groups, defined by demographic characteristics, occupation, and discipline.

The workforce is the lifeblood of the performing arts sector. Without the talent and effort of thousands - paid and unpaid - the brilliance of live performance would not be able to happen. Performing arts workers are also uniquely resilient and creative, accustomed to working as a team on tight deadlines, often in rapidly changing conditions. This survey will help us understand how the performing arts workforce is experiencing the effects of COVID-19 related restrictions, what kinds of coping strategies the workforce is using, and what your hopes are for the performing arts field in the months and years to come. 

This is important because, even as the number of jobs changes in response to sudden losses in revenue, understanding the other side of the equation is just as important: the people side. Lost jobs does NOT equate to lost talent, and we want to hear from the full array of talented people so a clear(er) picture can be formed of the performing arts sector’s future. 


Who should take it?

Everyone who works or volunteers in the performing arts: Performers and managers, directors and choreographers, front-of-house folx and box office teams, writers, technical and design folx, development and marketing, facility operators, vendors, and everyone else who makes the work happen. Your input is anonymous, and individual data will never be shared. 

More inforamtion about the purpose, authors, and survey HERE.

Count Me In: Volunteers Are an Essential Part of Doing Business

Today, StateraArts is publishing the final installation in a 4-part series by Meg Friedman based on her research COUNT ME IN: Leveraging Generational Differences to Sustain Volunteer Engagement. Here are the links to Part 1 , Part 2, and Part 3.

Art by Sarah Greenman

Art by Sarah Greenman

Count Me In: Volunteers Are an Essential Part of Doing Business

By Meg Friedman

 

This is about the value of volunteers.

Volunteer labor has been a substitute for capital since the start of the regional theater movement – and certainly, freely given labor has been a reality of community life for much, much longer than that.

It is time for the theater industry to recognize that volunteer labor is part of the cost of doing business. Without this subsidy, in the ticket-takers and annual fund callers and interns and more, many theaters would be fundamentally different – and some would close. (Imagine a theater festival without volunteers – pretty bleak, right?) In no way am I advocating for a field where all personnel are paid staff. As Michael Stotts gently observed, in a 2017 conversation, it’s important for the community and the theater to have the special relationship that comes from giving time. Community endorsement must be represented in more than dollars and cents. But the status quo around volunteer labor cannot survive the next fifty years without meaningful change.

Volunteer time has value, and if all our value-assessing tools are in dollars and cents, then time given should be accounted for in financial reporting. This will, and should, prompt changes in how funders and theaters evaluate success.

Volunteers are part of the workforce. They should be counted and understood as deeply as the paid members of that workforce. How can the theater sector advocate for better inclusion of women, people of color, youth, people with disabilities, and more and more marginalized groups, without counting volunteers? We manage to count so much already – the thirst for data is almost comical (a colleague recently described one organization with over 160 Key Performance Indicators – one of which is “How Many KPIs Do We Have”). If we state that the number of people involved in theater must be representative of any particular place or people, we have to include all the people who are making theater happen.

What next?

If we don’t develop new ways to value, welcome, and stay engaged with tomorrow’s volunteers, the not-for-profit theater sector’s most valuable subsidy will dry up. Plenty of theaters worried about going belly-up in the wake of the Great Recession (and plenty did – but many more have sprung up to take their place). Theaters are now, as I write this, in the third year of rallying along with museums, libraries, and other vital cultural institutions to save the National Endowment for the Arts, the Institute for Library Sciences, and other crucial sources of federal funding. But the decreasing number of volunteers is a ticking time bomb that has no federal budget line, and represents far more value than the NEA’s $152 million budgeted dollars in the last year.

So, what does that mean? Lots of things, for lots of stakeholders. Below are some broad suggestions geared toward funders, theater workers, and the people who work or volunteer in any supervisory role in theaters.

  • Count volunteers. Not just a headcount – understand the demographic and characteristics, and benchmark these data against peer theaters. TCG’s annual budget survey is tremendous and provides a model for this kind of peer benchmarking.

  • Find or make new pathways to connect volunteers to theaters. What tasks can volunteers do remotely? From board meetings to social media to script coverage to travel planning, plenty of tasks can be given to volunteers that do not require them to appear, dressed a certain way and already having eaten dinner, at 6:00pm sharp. Game-ifying these experiences could also minimize the sense that this is just work, done for no pay.

  •  Don’t “throw some volunteers at it.” Talking about volunteers as a trivial or infinite resource undermines the value of the gift and the experience on all sides. Teaching young theater professionals – many of whom are stepping away from unpaid internships themselves – to value and respect volunteers is essential to building the sector. Yesterday’s interns are tomorrow’s executives, and those of us in between those points have a responsibility to be inclusive of the workers around us, regardless of their pay scale.

Theaters are viable because of volunteer hours. Counting who volunteers, and the value of their time – and understanding how volunteers identify – is an imperative to continuing relevance.

This blog has been adapted from Count Me In: Leveraging Generational Differences To Sustain Volunteer Engagement. For the full report, click HERE. Here are the links to Part 1 , Part 2, and Part 3.


Meg Friedman Headshot.jpg

Meg Friedman is a Consultant with AMS Planning & Research, where her work includes strategic planning, facility feasibility, and a range of other research and decision-making services. Meg’s work touches arts and entertainment industry trends ranging from consumer preferences to venue design and the arts workforce. She has created dynamic financial models for small planning studies to multi-million-dollar facilities.

Past projects include the inaugural strategic plan for Assets for Artists, a program of MASS MoCA, and a strategic plan for the New England Foundation for the Arts. Meg has researched trends and best practices in arts venue development for the City of Boise, Idaho, the Kentucky Center for the Arts, and the City of Vaughan, Ontario. She has provided research for a chapter in Routledge’s Performing Arts Center Management and was a contributor to the 11th edition of Stage Management by Lawrence Stern and Jill Gold. Current projects include the planning of a new performing arts center in Sarasota, Florida, and research to define an arts sector investment strategy for The McConnell Foundation in Redding, California.

Meg holds a Master of Arts in Arts Administration from Goucher College and a BA in Theater Design and Production from UCLA. Prior to joining AMS, Meg was an AEA stage manager and worked on Broadway and Off-Broadway, as well as at leading regional theaters. She also served as a moderator for SMNetwork.org, the original free web forum for stage managers.

Meg tweets from @AMSarts and @megf_miles.

Count Me In: The Future of Volunteerism is Age-Diverse

Volunteer labor has been a substitute for capital since the start of the regional theater movement. Without this subsidy many theaters would be fundamentally different – and some would close. If we don’t develop new ways to value, welcome, and stay engaged with tomorrow’s volunteers, the not-for-profit theater sector’s most valuable subsidy will dry up. StateraArts is thrilled to publish a 4-part series this week by Meg Friedman based on her research COUNT ME IN: Leveraging Generational Differences to Sustain Volunteer Engagement.

Art by Sarah Greenman

Art by Sarah Greenman

Count Me In, Part 3: The Future of Volunteerism is Age-Diverse

by Meg Friedman 

The received wisdom in many not-for-profit theaters is that volunteers will be older (and whiter, and female). This is dangerous. While NEA data from 2005 supports the notion that arts volunteers are older than people volunteering in other parts of the sector, more recent studies suggest that older people are less able to volunteer than in years past.

Older Americans Are Retiring Later – Or Leaving Town When They Do Retire

As the Baby Boomers began aging into retirement, plenty of pundits anticipated a glut of volunteer labor. This enthusiasm has been dampened by the long-term consequences of the Great Recession. And many Boomers anticipate working at least part-time during retirement.

Many, if not most, of the Boomers currently contemplating retirement are pushing the horizon ahead. Those who choose to retire now may be facing significant economic stress, due to damaged savings over the past decade. Phil Santora, Managing Director of TheatreWorks Silicon Valley, observed to me in 2017 that even when prospective volunteers retired in his community, the cost of living in the Bay Area was so high that they quickly moved to less expensive areas – depleting, rather than adding to, the volunteer population.

Income-Generating Activity Absorbs the Time Millennials and Younger Adults Could Spend Volunteering

Economic insecurity – actual or perceived – may be forcing younger adults to fill otherwise volunteer-able hours with activities that generate income. Driving for a rideshare service, offering services on Fiverr or similar platforms, and more side hustles are increasingly common ways to fill marginal amounts of time. These activities are also flexible – whereas volunteering to usher an 8:00pm performance is decidedly not.  

Younger workers, a great many of whom are freelancers, may also be less frequently exposed to volunteer opportunities through workplace initiatives. Robert McGuire, founding principal of Nation1099, observed that the remarkable growth of gig work, while beneficial to many workers individually, likely undermines pathways to volunteerism that traditional workplaces once fostered. Terry Delavan, longtime theater volunteer and past Board President of the Conference About Volunteers Of Regional Theatres, expressed concern that workplace policies may also limit otherwise interested volunteers – by allowing just 16 hours annually, for instance, rather than making room for more substantial commitments.

Volunteer Programs and Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion

Some theaters are ahead of the pack – but many are playing catch-up when it comes to connecting volunteer programs with the work in equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). Danny Feldman, Executive Artistic Director at the Pasadena Playhouse, shared his candid concerns about creating a more age-diverse and age-inclusive environment, when many existing volunteers at the Playhouse represented a single demographic profile. While it may not be possible for every theater to maintain an age-diverse volunteer corps, confirmation bias and implicit ageism in recruitment and retention practices may undermine the way volunteer programs advance EDI priorities. And volunteer programs should advance EDI priorities, just like every other part of the institution. 

This blog has been adapted from Count Me In: Leveraging Generational Differences To Sustain Volunteer Engagement. For the full report, click HERE.

Tomorrow, StateraArts will publish Count Me In, Part 4: Volunteers Are an Essential Part of Doing Business. Here are the links to Part 1 , Part 2 and Part 4.


Meg Friedman Headshot.jpg

Meg Friedman is a Consultant with AMS Planning & Research, where her work includes strategic planning, facility feasibility, and a range of other research and decision-making services. Meg’s work touches arts and entertainment industry trends ranging from consumer preferences to venue design and the arts workforce. She has created dynamic financial models for small planning studies to multi-million-dollar facilities.

Past projects include the inaugural strategic plan for Assets for Artists, a program of MASS MoCA, and a strategic plan for the New England Foundation for the Arts. Meg has researched trends and best practices in arts venue development for the City of Boise, Idaho, the Kentucky Center for the Arts, and the City of Vaughan, Ontario. She has provided research for a chapter in Routledge’s Performing Arts Center Management and was a contributor to the 11th edition of Stage Management by Lawrence Stern and Jill Gold. Current projects include the planning of a new performing arts center in Sarasota, Florida, and research to define an arts sector investment strategy for The McConnell Foundation in Redding, California.

Meg holds a Master of Arts in Arts Administration from Goucher College and a BA in Theater Design and Production from UCLA. Prior to joining AMS, Meg was an AEA stage manager and worked on Broadway and Off-Broadway, as well as at leading regional theaters. She also served as a moderator for SMNetwork.org, the original free web forum for stage managers.

Meg tweets from @AMSarts and @megf_miles.

Count Me In: Racial Disparity in Theatre Personnel Hurts The Future

Volunteer labor has been a substitute for capital since the start of the regional theater movement. Without this subsidy many theaters would be fundamentally different – and some would close. If we don’t develop new ways to value, welcome, and stay engaged with tomorrow’s volunteers, the not-for-profit theater sector’s most valuable subsidy will dry up. StateraArts is thrilled to publish a 4-part series this week by Meg Friedman based on her research COUNT ME IN: Leveraging Generational Differences to Sustain Volunteer Engagement.

Art by Sarah Greenman

Art by Sarah Greenman

Count Me In, Part 2: Racial Disparity in Theatre Personnel Hurts The Future

By Meg Friedman

Regional American Theaters are viable because of volunteer hours. Counting who volunteers, and the value of their time – and understanding how volunteers identify – is an imperative to continuing relevance.

American communities are changing. Among other expert sources, the Pew Research Center tells us that within just a few decades, the notion of a white majority in the US will be more myth (or memory) than fact. There is no value judgment here about what shifting racial demographics mean, but it is critical that theaters anticipate this in their programming, staffing, and organizational strategy. Neglecting to do so almost certainly consigns theaters to dwindling financial and personnel resources, as their cultural relevance is reduced to a smaller and smaller slice of the population.

Data on audiences, staff, and freelance artists show that, as an industry, American not-for-profit theaters are overwhelmingly white. Yet there is no comprehensive approach to documenting and understanding the demographics of the people who make theater. Audience studies, analyses of staff and freelance workers, and Board studies all get done. Some of them are shared with the public, but where is a comprehensive data collection model? If it exists, it’s behind a pay wall. Simply: we do not have the tools to state with confidence that the people connected, in any fashion, to theaters in the US resemble the general population more or less than they did five, ten, or twenty years ago, or that we as a sector can understand what changes may be needed to stay relevant as demographic changes continue to shape our communities. As stakeholders throughout the arts question representation more thoughtfully and forcefully, we must find a better way to count who is engaged with the field. 

Okay, so what does that look like?

One of the first gaps to address is the big, generous elephant in the room: the volunteers. From ushers to occasional painters, potluck dinner chefs to folks who pour Dixie cups of wine at fundraisers, this unpaid labor force is vital to doing business and virtually invisible in the accounting. It is also highly likely that it is even more white than the Boards, staff, freelancers, and audiences of theaters.

According to national data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the volunteer rate has been dropping for all racial and ethnic groups except people identifying as Hispanic since 2011. For all non-white groups, the volunteer rate has remained consistently under 22% – suggesting, that a) volunteer data from organizations of color don’t get counted, or b) that available volunteer opportunities are not as appealing to people of color as they are to white people.

COUNT+ME+IN+fig.png

What should we do about this? Start counting – people, hours, demographics, and the equivalent in dollars that volunteers give through their contributions of time.

While for some theaters it might be risky to reverse-engineer volunteer hours into their cash flow or tax return, it’s also terribly risky to leave this labor force out of the math altogether. Danny Feldman, Producing Artistic Director at the Pasadena Playhouse, shared concerns when we spoke in 2017 that the perceived value (and retention) of volunteers was a strategic challenge for the field; in the time since, the Friends of the Pasadena Playhouse has revamped its website, and now proudly states the dollar value of the hours contributed for the most recent year – a whopping $921,734.02 in 2018, representing over 32,000 hours. (The Friends used the Independent Sector rate for State of California to reach this assessment – more about that here.) 

The existing data on volunteer demographics is vanishingly slim. (For a thoughtful examination of volunteer trends and issues in LA County, see this report. I’d love to see this approach reproduced on a grander scale.) A service organization like TCG, which already gathers extensive theater data, could lead the conversation toward personnel makeup and a broader definition of resources than just financial data. With respect for the TCG Board, staff, and volunteers, this effort may simply not be desirable or feasible. But the opportunity is open for a researcher or organization to start counting. Before falling volunteer availability and interest cause serious pain in the field, we should understand who’s subsidizing the work with their time – so we can plan accordingly.

This blog has been adapted from Count Me In: Leveraging Generational Differences To Sustain Volunteer Engagement. For the full report, click HERE. Here are the links to Part 1 , Part 3, and Part 4.


Meg Friedman Headshot.jpg

Meg Friedman is a Consultant with AMS Planning & Research, where her work includes strategic planning, facility feasibility, and a range of other research and decision-making services. Meg’s work touches arts and entertainment industry trends ranging from consumer preferences to venue design and the arts workforce. She has created dynamic financial models for small planning studies to multi-million-dollar facilities.

Past projects include the inaugural strategic plan for Assets for Artists, a program of MASS MoCA, and a strategic plan for the New England Foundation for the Arts. Meg has researched trends and best practices in arts venue development for the City of Boise, Idaho, the Kentucky Center for the Arts, and the City of Vaughan, Ontario. She has provided research for a chapter in Routledge’s Performing Arts Center Management and was a contributor to the 11th edition of Stage Management by Lawrence Stern and Jill Gold. Current projects include the planning of a new performing arts center in Sarasota, Florida, and research to define an arts sector investment strategy for The McConnell Foundation in Redding, California.

Meg holds a Master of Arts in Arts Administration from Goucher College and a BA in Theater Design and Production from UCLA. Prior to joining AMS, Meg was an AEA stage manager and worked on Broadway and Off-Broadway, as well as at leading regional theaters. She also served as a moderator for SMNetwork.org, the original free web forum for stage managers.

Meg tweets from @AMSarts and @megf_miles.

Count Me In: If Volunteers Are More Highly Valued, Does Volunteer Work Become More or Less Gendered?

Volunteer labor has been a substitute for capital since the start of the regional theater movement. Without this subsidy many theaters would be fundamentally different – and some would close. If we don’t develop new ways to value, welcome, and stay engaged with tomorrow’s volunteers, the not-for-profit theater sector’s most valuable subsidy will dry up. StateraArts is thrilled to publish a 4-part series this week by Meg Friedman based on her research COUNT ME IN: Leveraging Generational Differences to Sustain Volunteer Engagement.

Art by Sarah Greenman

Art by Sarah Greenman

Count Me In, Part 1: If Volunteers Are More Highly Valued, Does Volunteer Work Become More or Less Gendered?

By Meg Friedman

Most Volunteers Are Women For a Reason – But Does The Reason Still Exist?

Women – particularly cisgender, heterosexual women, actually or presumed to be living in marriage – have been the prototypical volunteer imagined by not-for-profit leaders for decades. As the arts and culture sector exploded in the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s, a twenty-year long effort to put women back in the kitchen after World War II meant that a corps of energized women had the ability and appetite to do work outside the home – with a decreasing number of outlets for that desire. Volunteering in the not-for-profit space could satisfy at least part of that desire. While it wasn’t (and still isn’t) recognized as participation in the economy, volunteering can closely mirror all the other benefits of working: exercising and expanding one’s skills; participating in a shared effort to reach a common, visible goal; contributing to a purpose larger than oneself; learning; and opportunities to connect meaningfully with new people.

Over the past 50 years, however, women’s economic participation has rightly earned closer attention and become easier to capture in data. Thanks to generations of activism, and the expanding definition of “women” educational and professional opportunities have become more accessible and the legal environment incrementally more supportive of anti-discrimination, anti-sexist practices. Generation X, people born (roughly) between 1960 and 1980 in the US, saw for the first time a critical reversal: more women than men completed college degrees. While the pay gap remains unresolved, any education gap has been closed for over a decade – perhaps an early sign of a major shift in volunteer participation.

When Women Already Have Social Capital, is Volunteering Necessary?

With more formal education – and as a result more professional opportunities and obligations – do women need to volunteer? And can they? Fifty years ago, my grandmother and her peers could not be the sole signatory on a bank account, much less assume they would author their own professional story. Now, women are perceived to be delaying key life milestones in favor of building educational credentials and a stable career. It should go without saying that meeting these goals requires an overwhelming investment of time and energy. So, where does volunteerism fit in? For many women, volunteering at theaters or elsewhere simply may not be relevant. Or, as life milestones and lifespans extend deeper into women’s thirties and forties and fifties, it may be that family and professional priorities always rise to the top. Volunteering just cannot supersede caring for aging parents, or juggling career growth alongside childrearing, for example. The volunteer opportunities either fall to the wayside or have to be designed to accommodate ever-busier, more ambitious women with an increasing share of social capital.

Reconceiving How Theaters Value (Women’s) Labor

Theaters can respond to these forces in a number of ways – and these responses fit into a potential sea change in how performing arts not-for-profits value labor. The “women’s work” of stuffing envelopes, tearing tickets, and cooking potluck welcome dinners no longer aligns with how rising generations of women envision their labor contributions. Leadership and decision-making roles, however, are clear paths forward. Women are still woefully underrepresented in the leadership of not-for-profit theaters, but as the #MeToo movement advances, along with parallel activism for wage parity and transparency, theaters can embrace the opportunity to make room at the table for women to take leadership roles as volunteers – through board service and in other areas. The notion that a woman volunteer is automatically a helper and not a decider must go away.

This points to a larger opportunity facing theaters: developing a new understanding of the cost of doing business, as a function of how we value labor.

This blog has been adapted from Count Me In: Leveraging Generational Differences To Sustain Volunteer Engagement. For the full report, click HERE. Here are the links to Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4.


Meg Friedman Headshot.jpg

Meg Friedman is a Consultant with AMS Planning & Research, where her work includes strategic planning, facility feasibility, and a range of other research and decision-making services. Meg’s work touches arts and entertainment industry trends ranging from consumer preferences to venue design and the arts workforce. She has created dynamic financial models for small planning studies to multi-million-dollar facilities.

Past projects include the inaugural strategic plan for Assets for Artists, a program of MASS MoCA, and a strategic plan for the New England Foundation for the Arts. Meg has researched trends and best practices in arts venue development for the City of Boise, Idaho, the Kentucky Center for the Arts, and the City of Vaughan, Ontario. She has provided research for a chapter in Routledge’s Performing Arts Center Management and was a contributor to the 11th edition of Stage Management by Lawrence Stern and Jill Gold. Current projects include the planning of a new performing arts center in Sarasota, Florida, and research to define an arts sector investment strategy for The McConnell Foundation in Redding, California.

Meg holds a Master of Arts in Arts Administration from Goucher College and a BA in Theater Design and Production from UCLA. Prior to joining AMS, Meg was an AEA stage manager and worked on Broadway and Off-Broadway, as well as at leading regional theaters. She also served as a moderator for SMNetwork.org, the original free web forum for stage managers.

Meg tweets from @AMSarts and @megf_miles.